Insights & Articles

Who does it better? Assessing a value-based drug price in Europe vs the US

U.S. and European healthcare payers are increasing their utilization of value-based drug pricing agreements to hold down drug costs, bring better value and improvements to health outcomes, and determine a fair price for new drugs. The question of who does the assessments to determine a drug’s fair price is answered differently in the EU than in the U.S.

 

National healthcare leaders have a common problem to solve and a common goal to achieve. The problem is how to protect national healthcare budgets from overwhelming drug costs without discouraging pharmaceutical manufacturers from developing new products. The goal is to provide populations with equitable access to innovative, safe, clinically effective, and cost-effective healthcare therapies.

In the U.S., payers and policymakers are trying to control drug expenditures and determine the value of new drugs in an opaque, free-market environment. In Europe, government price controls and centralized clinical and economic evaluations of new drugs are standard. For both these pharmaceutical markets, drug pricing agreements based on value instead of volume are gaining traction.

The problem: drug prices keep rising

Pharmaceutical sales in Europe are almost a quarter of all drug sales globally. From 2015 to 2020, the top five European markets–the UK, Germany, France, Italy, and Spain–accounted for 17.4% of sales of new drug therapies. These top five markets are predicted to increase spending by $51 billion through 2026.

North America is the largest pharmaceutical market, accounting for almost half of the total global sales. From 2015 through 2020, the U.S. purchased 63.7% of all the new medicines introduced. The U.S. is expected to increase drug spending by an estimated $119 billion through 2026.

According to IQVIA, a leading healthcare consulting firm, the change in drug spending in the U.S. and European markets through 2026 will be due, in large part, to new brands.

The goal: access to new, high-quality drug treatments at a fair price

Healthcare payers don’t want to take on the financial risk and clinical uncertainty of a new, high-cost pharmaceutical product. Payers want to provide patients with equitable access to innovative treatments that improve health outcomes, especially in therapeutic areas with unmet health needs.

Value-based drug pricing arrangements address these concerns with evidence-driven, outcome-based agreements. The payer and manufacturer share the risks of a new drug not performing as expected. In both the U.S. and the EU, payers and manufacturers are engaged in more finance-based drug pricing contracts than performance-based contracts–but this trend is shifting.

Assessing a drug’s value in the EU healthcare system

Value-based drug pricing arrangements are called managed entry agreements (MEAs) in Europe. MEAs between drug manufacturers and healthcare payers can be finance-based (FBAs), performance-based (PBAs), or service-based agreements (SBAs).

Unlike the U.S., the EU has a centralized system for assessing a drug’s value. Each EU member state has an agency that uses an evidence-based data gathering process called health technology assessments (HTAs). HTAs include nine domains for assessment–four clinical and five non-clinical–that evaluate the efficacy and added value of a new drug compared to other treatment options already available on the market.

The work of the member states’ HTA bodies is coordinated by the European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA). However, conclusions and decisions related to drug pricing and reimbursement remain de-centralized.

Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) may be a part of an MEA and come after the HTA. CED is a way for urgently needed treatments to come to market under conditional approval while real-world evidence continues to be collected. This additional data should help payers decide about coverage. CED use varies by country, with the most CED found in the UK and the U.S. (through Medicare).

Related Post: Indication-specific pricing to make inroads in the U.S.

Assessing a drug’s value in the US healthcare system

The possibility of developing a centralized Health Technology Assessment for the U.S. Healthcare System was the focus and title of a white paper published in early 2020 by the University of Southern California Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics.

The white paper describes the complexities of creating a national HTA organization in the U.S. It examines the difficult dynamics of the many stakeholders in the healthcare system; few are operating with enough transparency and coordination with other stakeholders to support value-based drug pricing. The authors conclude that in the current polarized legislative environment in the U.S., an attempt to develop a national HTA organization would be met with strong political resistance.

In the absence of the European-style centralized HTA body, U.S. payers look to alternative sources for the data they need for drug pricing negotiations. Private and public payers may find clinical and economic evaluations from various agencies that do HTAs on a limited scale. These include government and independent organizations, such as the Department of Veteran’s Affairs, Medicaid, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). One of the most influential organizations in this space is the independent, non-profit Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER).

Unfortunately, these organizations don’t do value-based pricing evaluations for every drug that comes on the market, and some of their work is not publicly available. Even if analysis of a selected drug is available, it may not cover the key metrics a customized value-based drug pricing agreement needs to track.

When real-world data about a drug’s performance is limited, it’s often up to the manufacturer and payer entering the value-based contract to develop the framework and the data collection and analysis capability, either in-house or through a third-party vendor.

The Lyfegen Solution

The Lyfegen Platform is a customizable solution for healthcare payers, pharma, and medtech companies who need to gather and analyze real-world evidence about a drug’s performance for value-based drug pricing agreements. Lyfegen’s value-based contracting software collects real-world data and uses intelligent algorithms to provide valuable insights into clinical effectiveness and costs.

Lyfegen’s contracting platform helps implement and scale value-based drug pricing contracts with greater efficiency and transparency. By enabling the shift away from volume-based, fee-for-service healthcare to value-based healthcare, Lyfegen increases access to healthcare treatments and their affordability.

To learn more about Lyfegen’s software solutions, contact us to book a demo.

BOOK A DEMO

Related blogs

Gene Therapies: Negotiating the Priceless-Insights from the Lyfegen 2024 Drug Contracting Trends Report

READ MORE

Gene Therapies: Negotiating the Priceless-Insights from the Lyfegen 2024 Drug Contracting Trends Report

With price tags in the millions, gene therapies are redefining medicine—and reshaping how we negotiate access to it. For both payers and pharmaceutical companies, these breakthrough treatments present a shared challenge: how do you fund what feels priceless?

From Zolgensma to Hemgenix, gene therapies promise one-time cures for rare and life-threatening diseases. But the financial model behind them can’t follow the traditional playbook. These treatments call for a smarter, more collaborative approach to pricing—and that’s exactly what’s taking root.

Why Payers and Pharma Need a New Playbook

Unlike conventional drugs, gene therapies frontload their cost while delivering benefits over time. That disconnect forces a fundamental rethink of how pricing, reimbursement, and risk-sharing are handled.

According to the Lyfegen 2024 Drug Contracting Trends Report, health systems worldwide are moving toward innovative agreements: outcome guarantees, installment plans, and subscription-based models. These aren’t just experiments—they’re becoming essential tools to balance patient access with financial responsibility.

For payers, it’s about managing risk while maintaining equity. For pharma, it’s about demonstrating value in a way that aligns with clinical reality. Either way, the direction is clear: shared risk, shared benefit.

Global Shifts That Are Shaping the Market

The trends are global and accelerating. In the United States, payers like Blue Cross Blue Shield and Medicaid are embracing outcome-based models for sickle cell gene therapies like Casgevy and Lyfgenia. Brazil’s Ministry of Health uses installment payments for Zolgensma, spreading risk over five years while tying reimbursement to real-world outcomes.

In Europe, countries like Spain and Italy combine restricted coverage with annual reassessments, ensuring that high-cost therapies are only reimbursed if they continue to deliver results.

The message? Pricing innovation is no longer a nice-to-have—it’s the only way forward.

How Lyfegen Bridges the Gap

At Lyfegen, we help payers and pharma move beyond the negotiation table—and into action.

• Our Agreements Library, the world’s largest digital repository of value-based contracts, helps you understand what others are doing and where the benchmarks lie.

• Our pricing simulation engine lets both sides explore scenarios before committing—making deals smarter from day one.

• And our automated platform handles everything from contract setup to rebate tracking, saving time, reducing risk, and driving transparency.

A Smarter Way to Fund the Future of Medicine

Gene therapies will continue to challenge the limits of what we think healthcare can afford. But with the right models and tools, both payers and pharma can find common ground—ensuring that innovation reaches the patients who need it most.

Curious about what’s next in drug contracting?

Download the 2024 Drug Contracting Trends Report for exclusive insights, real-world examples, and global benchmarks.

👉 Get the full report now

Read More

A Bright New Chapter in UK Healthcare: How AI-Driven Reform Will Transform Drug Pricing and Access

READ MORE

A Bright New Chapter in UK Healthcare: How AI-Driven Reform Will Transform Drug Pricing and Access

The UK government is taking a bold step toward modernizing public services by cutting red tape, integrating AI into operations, and bringing NHS England back under direct ministerial control. This reform signals a shift toward efficiency, innovation, and better patient care—one where AI-driven solutions like Lyfegen can play a pivotal role.

A New Dawn for NHS England

NHS England was originally established in 2012 as an arm’s-length organization to insulate the health service from political interference. Over time, however, bureaucracy accumulated, slowing decision-making and increasing costs. With Starmer’s decision to fold NHS England’s functions back into the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), the system is poised for a fresh start. This restructuring aims to eliminate redundant roles, reduce administrative waste, and reallocate resources to frontline care—ushering in a new era of efficient and accountable healthcare management.

What’s Changing in the UK’s Healthcare System?

A key takeaway from Starmer’s announcement is his strong push for automation. The government is aiming to cut administrative costs by 25%, ensuring that resources are directed where they matter most: patient care.

Some of the expected changes include:

  • Investing in AI & Digital Tools – Automating processes to enhance efficiency and decision-making.
  • Hiring More Digital Experts – Training 2,000 new tech apprentices by 2030, with 10% of civil servants working in tech roles.
  • Reducing Administrative Waste – Freeing up time and funds by using AI to handle repetitive tasks, allowing healthcare professionals to focus on patient outcomes.

The Impact on Drug Prices and Healthcare Access

By integrating NHS England’s functions into the DHSC, the government is positioned to strengthen and streamline negotiations with pharmaceutical companies. This shift could lead to:

  • Lower Drug Prices – Reduced bureaucracy means more direct resources for securing better pricing.
  • Stronger Negotiating Power – Direct ministerial oversight can drive sustained cost reductions rather than short-term fixes.
  • Faster Access to Medicines – Savings from automation and efficiency gains can be reinvested into reducing wait times and improving treatment availability.
  • Enhanced Value-Based Care – AI tools will optimize drug pricing strategies, ensuring maximum rebates and cost efficiency.
  • Short-Term Disruptions, Long-Term Gains – The transition may temporarily affect drug supply and pricing, but AI-driven analytics will help stabilize and reduce costs in the long run.

The AI Revolution: Powering Efficiency and Innovation

One of the most promising aspects of this reform is the government’s commitment to leveraging AI to transform operations. For an AI-powered platform like Lyfegen, this presents a significant opportunity to deliver real-world benefits in healthcare management. Here’s how Lyfegen can help:

  • Optimized Negotiations – With NHS England now under ministerial control, data-driven pricing will be crucial. Lyfegen’s Agreements Library can benchmark UK drug prices against global agreements, ensuring smarter, fairer negotiations.
  • Automated Contracting – Our AI-powered platform streamlines drug contract creation and management, reducing paperwork and making negotiations faster and more efficient.
  • Real-Time Pricing Simulations – Before finalizing agreements, Lyfegen runs real-time simulations to test different pricing scenarios, identifying the most financially and operationally beneficial outcomes.
  • Capturing Hidden Savings – By automating drug rebate management, Lyfegen detects missed savings, ensuring that every possible dollar is recovered and reinvested into patient care.

Challenges to Watch

While AI promises to revolutionize healthcare efficiency, successful implementation will require overcoming hurdles such as:

  • Data Integration – Ensuring AI systems can seamlessly access and analyze NHS data.
  • Change Management – Encouraging widespread adoption of digital tools among healthcare professionals.
  • Regulatory Compliance – Navigating evolving policies around AI-driven decision-making in healthcare.

A Bright Future for Lyfegen and the Healthcare Sector

Transforming the NHS is no small task. Beyond balancing innovation and cost, the government must manage vast amounts of healthcare data and navigate the complexities of implementing change at scale. However, Starmer’s announcement represents more than just another cycle of NHS reforms—it’s a meaningful step toward a future where efficiency and technology-driven innovation deliver real, lasting benefits to patients.

At Lyfegen, we’re ready to support this transformation by delivering AI-powered solutions that drive real savings and faster patient access. Let’s build a smarter, more efficient NHS together.

Want to see how our AI-powered solutions can support smarter drug pricing and better healthcare access? Let’s schedule a demo today.

Read More